User talk:Hans Johnson/Archive3
From RationalWikiWiki
Archives
|
Am I welcome? Hans Johnson 03:03, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Good thing you're here! Admin 03:08, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- *coldly* Is it? Hans Johnson 03:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Import pages
Can you import the following pages for me?
Ajuk"Padme Amidala"
Clio Bluestocking
Edit warring
KGT
Mostly harmless
RationalWiki Forums
Petition for the return of SusanG
RationalWiki mission statement
RationalWiki social ladder
RationalWiki social rank
RationalWikians by Education
Rationalwiki.info
Religion
RyanB
SDG
SHahB
Samwell Incident
Sanity block
ScribbleWiki: RationalWikiWiki:About
ScribbleWiki: RationalWikiWiki:Administrators
ScribbleWiki: RationalWikiWiki:Bureaucrats
ScribbleWiki: RationalWikiWiki:Community Portal
ScribbleWiki: RationalWikiWiki:General disclaimer
Snarky point of view
Social ladder
Sockpuppet
Special Discussion Group
Subversion
TK Protocol
Talk pages
The Samwell Incident
The goat vs. jerboa controversies
Thunderkatz
TmtamesP
Trent
Uncyclopedia
WIGO
WJThomas
Walking dead
Wikinterpreter
Wikinterpretererer
--Import 03:30, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome back? Have you got a job? --Admin 05:21, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey
Make me a sysop. --Enghorn 00:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Done. Hans Johnson 01:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Wow. Is it really that easy? --Enghorn 02:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- It is if you're a bureaucrat. Hans Johnson 06:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- How about that next? --71.8.59.31 15:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- THat's very mean of you. It's not like I would've done anything had you said no. --Enghorn 23:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- I realized that just after I gave it to you. But then I figured you wouldn't do anything if I took it away, either :-) Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 00:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- SO you just decided to be mean to me instead of nice? --Enghorn 00:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Apologies. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 01:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- No biggie. --Enghorn 01:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Apologies. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 01:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- SO you just decided to be mean to me instead of nice? --Enghorn 00:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- I realized that just after I gave it to you. But then I figured you wouldn't do anything if I took it away, either :-) Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 00:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- THat's very mean of you. It's not like I would've done anything had you said no. --Enghorn 23:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- How about that next? --71.8.59.31 15:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- It is if you're a bureaucrat. Hans Johnson 06:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Wow. Is it really that easy? --Enghorn 02:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Move
Slightly odder than the last one. Were we meant to lose all the accounts? Gloom. 04:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Incidentally, how long has this place been up? Gloom. 04:55, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- I needed access to the localsettings file, and we needed to be on a proper server for that. (Ironically, while I can access it now, I don't how.) Leaving the accounts behind is an unfortunate consequence of the move. For reference purposes, the record still remains on the first and second sites. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 05:05, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- We've been up since 'bout July 26th. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 05:05, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Blatant test of my sig
Fish? Tell me about the fish. ~ Pink 08:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Question
How notable does a user have to be before it gets a page? Or is there no guidelines, just wheneverwefeelikeit? --Enghorn 22:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- We have informal guidelines. We will absolutely not write about professional vandals (i.e. the HAGGER vandals), and I disapprove of articles about users with less than thirty or forty edits (but that's just my personal opinion). Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 23:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
What in God's name are you doing?
With that Mediawiki thing. It's bizarre, I tells you. ~ Pink 17:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- But it works! We now have a reason-dropdown box when locking pages (similar to the reason-dropdown box for deleting pages)! See for yourself. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 17:30, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- FYI, Gloom, you are one of only a few policepersons. In case you weren't aware. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 17:30, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- You mean Policepeople, obviously. ~ Pink 04:12, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
welcome/help
there is a red link in the welcome template to the alleged help files. Also, the link in the sidebar goes nowhere... Human 21:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Href
I'm too tired to write this message. Please ask me what I was going to say next time you see me. Night night. ~ Pink 01:40, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
A Solution
I have proposed a solution in the main page talk. Please do not completely write it off from what opinions you may have of me. I think it might work. The Adjudicator 12:00, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
You haven't responded yet. Unless Vicious is your sock (ITs either you or Susan) The Adjudicator 13:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
I might as well say it here as well. You did a very good thing today. A good compromise. This is my official pat on the back to you. The Adjudicator 19:30, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 19:46, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Test
Template:Test2's my favorite. 217.171.129.71 03:54, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed. And why haven't you joined yet? Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 04:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'm here -
I'm a sock- I'm everyman - I'm omnipresent, 217.171.129.71 05:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)- And you're littering red exclamation points everywhere : ) Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 07:03, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- If you joined, I'd make you a janitor in a heartbeat; it would allow you greater freedom to work with your templates. nudge nudge Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 07:03, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not actually that bothered. It was just a chance to practice some CSS. Sorry. 217.171.129.71 07:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Spoilsport :-( Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 09:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not actually that bothered. It was just a chance to practice some CSS. Sorry. 217.171.129.71 07:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'm here -
Holyroller
Shake, shake, throw... snake eyes! Thanks! --MAstEr oF pUPetStalk! 02:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Your welcome. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 02:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Holiday Cheer!
Christmas!
--MAstEr oF pUPetStalk! 18:00, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. Merry Christmas to you, too. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 04:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Dead Linx
I've just tried a few links & found several to be dead. (middle two in Barbara Shack's refs & @ least 2 in SusanG's) Fat Tuesday 01:39, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Master of pupppetss has effed up teh font & color Fat Tuesday 01:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- I see that Admin already fixed one of them. I'll try to fix the others. Thank you for pointing them out. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 03:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
User right request
You might as well make CUR a janitor; he isn't exactly going to go on a vandal spree or mercilessly delete pages.
19:18, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, well, same with me and I haven't been made a janitor. Fall down 22:40, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're not exactly trustworthy.
15:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Power corrupts. No thank you. I mean, I wouldn't raise a huge objection, but I have no great wish. It's not exactly as if I would be more useful then before. And no, Fall Down, you aren't trustworthy. At all. --ConservapediaUndergroundResistor 18:16, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Or on the other hand, anything that could possibly annoy Fall down. That way I can edit his article. --ConservapediaUndergroundResistor 18:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- No you can't. It's locked so that only crats can edit. -- Nx talk 21:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Then I suppose that I will merely do what is asked of me. --ConservapediaUndergroundResistor 21:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- No you can't. It's locked so that only crats can edit. -- Nx talk 21:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Or on the other hand, anything that could possibly annoy Fall down. That way I can edit his article. --ConservapediaUndergroundResistor 18:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Power corrupts. No thank you. I mean, I wouldn't raise a huge objection, but I have no great wish. It's not exactly as if I would be more useful then before. And no, Fall Down, you aren't trustworthy. At all. --ConservapediaUndergroundResistor 18:16, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're not exactly trustworthy.
Rename Request.
I screwed up--need an extra "i" in there. Thanks. RationalwikwikiUndergroundResistor 01:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'd do it but no button says "rename user" in my medicine jar. I'm sure HJ will get his hands on it. humanbe in 04:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 07:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- As expected. Please to wipe them off afterwards. humanbe in 08:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 13:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome, RUR. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 00:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 13:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- As expected. Please to wipe them off afterwards. humanbe in 08:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 07:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
System messages
Why are the system messages locked to Janitors?
16:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- *shrugs* That is just how I set it up. I didn't consider very much when I did so. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 00:59, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
I always knew you'd come back with your tail between your legs, but the least you can do is take down your parting shot now.— Unsigned, by: MC / talk / contribs
Listen, wanker
Why exactly are you behaving like an unresponsive authoritarian shit? You little irrelevant piece of crap. Stop blocking me or I'll just insist on socking up and trolling you all into submission. Have you learnt nothing of trolls? We energise from any opportunity which allows us to feel indignant. Your blocking of me, besides the fact thats its just wrong and against your own faggoty principles, is only feeding me and making me stronger. Unblock all of my accounts now or get prepared for a lifelong troll who WILL hang around here out of sheer bitterness. Prick. TheCicero 16:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- If you do not undo those blocks, I will be incredibly nasty and offensive to you, more than I've been to anyone else before. I'll make you cry yourself to sleep before this is all over, you piece of shit. TheCicero 16:38, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- At risk of feeding our little vandal/troll, you'd hang around no matter what, so why the fuck on Earth should anyone give a fuck about your stupid threats when you'll follow through no matter what anybody does? You are a sociopathetic hypocrite with no life and nothing better to do than bully people on the goddamn internet all day! MNpunkboy 17:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- I thought your pathetic rant worthy of a cretin over on RW would be 'the last thing you'd ever say to me'? Perhaps you and your vainglorious nonsense should go and fuck off somewhere where somebody can give a shit. I have no interest here. RWW bored me easily and I have no real interest in this website. What gives me valuable grievance is that LITTLE SHIT RA thinking he can act the fucking dullard dictator and get away with it. On a point of principle, I ain't going anywhere until he revokes those bans and apologises. I wouldn't be here otherwise Goonie, and I don't give a fuck what you think you pathetic 'rebel without a cause'. Just keep on scaring your elders with your 'like, totally, rebellious behaviour dude' bullshit. Now go fuck off and join your friend RA among the cast of societal rejects who seek social solace on the fucking internet. MarcusTullius 20:37, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- So you don't deny what I said about you, then. Gotcha! MNpunkboy 00:29, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- I thought your pathetic rant worthy of a cretin over on RW would be 'the last thing you'd ever say to me'? Perhaps you and your vainglorious nonsense should go and fuck off somewhere where somebody can give a shit. I have no interest here. RWW bored me easily and I have no real interest in this website. What gives me valuable grievance is that LITTLE SHIT RA thinking he can act the fucking dullard dictator and get away with it. On a point of principle, I ain't going anywhere until he revokes those bans and apologises. I wouldn't be here otherwise Goonie, and I don't give a fuck what you think you pathetic 'rebel without a cause'. Just keep on scaring your elders with your 'like, totally, rebellious behaviour dude' bullshit. Now go fuck off and join your friend RA among the cast of societal rejects who seek social solace on the fucking internet. MarcusTullius 20:37, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- At risk of feeding our little vandal/troll, you'd hang around no matter what, so why the fuck on Earth should anyone give a fuck about your stupid threats when you'll follow through no matter what anybody does? You are a sociopathetic hypocrite with no life and nothing better to do than bully people on the goddamn internet all day! MNpunkboy 17:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
I always knew you'd come back with your tail between your legs, but the least you can do is take down your parting shot now.— Unsigned, by: MC / talk / contribs
Listen, wanker
Why exactly are you behaving like an unresponsive authoritarian shit? You little irrelevant piece of crap. Stop blocking me or I'll just insist on socking up and trolling you all into submission. Have you learnt nothing of trolls? We energise from any opportunity which allows us to feel indignant. Your blocking of me, besides the fact thats its just wrong and against your own faggoty principles, is only feeding me and making me stronger. Unblock all of my accounts now or get prepared for a lifelong troll who WILL hang around here out of sheer bitterness. Prick. TheCicero 16:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- If you do not undo those blocks, I will be incredibly nasty and offensive to you, more than I've been to anyone else before. I'll make you cry yourself to sleep before this is all over, you piece of shit. TheCicero 16:38, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- At risk of feeding our little vandal/troll, you'd hang around no matter what, so why the fuck on Earth should anyone give a fuck about your stupid threats when you'll follow through no matter what anybody does? You are a sociopathetic hypocrite with no life and nothing better to do than bully people on the goddamn internet all day! MNpunkboy 17:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- I thought your pathetic rant worthy of a cretin over on RW would be 'the last thing you'd ever say to me'? Perhaps you and your vainglorious nonsense should go and fuck off somewhere where somebody can give a shit. I have no interest here. RWW bored me easily and I have no real interest in this website. What gives me valuable grievance is that LITTLE SHIT RA thinking he can act the fucking dullard dictator and get away with it. On a point of principle, I ain't going anywhere until he revokes those bans and apologises. I wouldn't be here otherwise Goonie, and I don't give a fuck what you think you pathetic 'rebel without a cause'. Just keep on scaring your elders with your 'like, totally, rebellious behaviour dude' bullshit. Now go fuck off and join your friend RA among the cast of societal rejects who seek social solace on the fucking internet. MarcusTullius 20:37, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- So you don't deny what I said about you, then. Gotcha! MNpunkboy 00:29, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- I thought your pathetic rant worthy of a cretin over on RW would be 'the last thing you'd ever say to me'? Perhaps you and your vainglorious nonsense should go and fuck off somewhere where somebody can give a shit. I have no interest here. RWW bored me easily and I have no real interest in this website. What gives me valuable grievance is that LITTLE SHIT RA thinking he can act the fucking dullard dictator and get away with it. On a point of principle, I ain't going anywhere until he revokes those bans and apologises. I wouldn't be here otherwise Goonie, and I don't give a fuck what you think you pathetic 'rebel without a cause'. Just keep on scaring your elders with your 'like, totally, rebellious behaviour dude' bullshit. Now go fuck off and join your friend RA among the cast of societal rejects who seek social solace on the fucking internet. MarcusTullius 20:37, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- At risk of feeding our little vandal/troll, you'd hang around no matter what, so why the fuck on Earth should anyone give a fuck about your stupid threats when you'll follow through no matter what anybody does? You are a sociopathetic hypocrite with no life and nothing better to do than bully people on the goddamn internet all day! MNpunkboy 17:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
I'll ask nicely, one last time
I'm asking nicely, will you unblock all of my accounts? Here are the following reasons a) Blocking serves no purpose, I can return whenever I like, b) You're breaking your own principles anyway, c) Its creating unnecessarty aggravation, d) I have no interest in this site and promise to leave ye be as soon as I'm unblocked, e) If you don't do it I'll troll this community for as long as possible. I mightn't be on everyday because I've a life, but every time I think about it I'll come on here and point out some home truths to you personally. You are too easy to mock (Your description of Nx as a 'colleague' proves, my God, its eating me up inside not to capitalise on that one!)
The choice is yours Hans. Its between being a dick and not being a dick. Have a bit of sense will you? Cicero 11:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- You forget that this is RWW, not RW, and RWW does not have the vandal bin, and RWW does block trolls. -- Nx / talk 16:26, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Infinite blocks have only been happening recently, & don't appear to be reflected in any stated policy. It does strike me as rather pointless when the blocked user can continue creating new accounts. weaseLICIOuS Bite Me 18:39, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- When will RA learn that by blocking me he serves only to give me a reason to come back here? I have left RW, and I will leave RWW as soon as he unblocks me. I'm prepared to edit war like hell and insult everything that moves until he unblocks me or AT THE VERY FUCKING LEAST, engages me head on, rather than ignoring me. (Oh, and RA, NOBODY on RW likes you)
- "unblock me and I'll leave" - nobody's buying that. Why ask to unblocked and not use it? Totnesmartin 19:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Are you really so remarkably unintelligent? As a point of principle, I dislike being blocked for the pathetic reasons he gave. In fact Hans blocked me just after I said I was leaving RW. He admitted that he broke the sites rules and made no reply. All in all, I'm doing this solely because RA went out of his way to annoy me. This is his punishment. I will not go away until my accounts are unblocked. And you also have to ask yourself why I would demand to have my accounts unblocked if I can circumvent the blocks with such obvious ease.
- Still here, fuckface. Haha 23:25, 20 December 2009 (UTC)